To interpret your results accurately, it is essential to understand the statistical framework behind our assessments. We utilize rigorous psychometric standards to ensure that every score reflects true cognitive ability.

The Scoring System

Your results are presented as a Standard Score (IQ) based on the SD15 (Standard Deviation 15) scale. This is the global gold standard for cognitive measurement, used by clinical psychologists and high-intelligence societies worldwide.

There are three types of psychometric scales, that are measuring intelligence, ensuring the global standards: 

1. The Reliability scale

2. The g-loading scale

3. The Validity scale

1.

Reliability – (The measurement of consistency)

Refers to the internal consistency and stability of a test.

We measure this using Cronbach’s Alpha, which tells us how reliably the items within a test measure the same underlying construct.

Reliability – Scale

0 – 0.50: Unacceptable

0.51 – 0.69: Poor

0.70 – 0.79: Acceptable

0.80 – 0.89: Good

0.90 – 1.00: Excellent

Our Performance: Our tests maintain high-level reliability, with coefficients typically ranging between 0.74 and 0.89, ensuring a very low margin of error.

2.

(g)-loading – (The General Intelligence Factor – Measurement of general intelligence)

This metric defines how much of the test result is attributed to your general intelligence (gF).

g-loading represents the correlation between a specific test and general intelligence. High-range tests aim for a g-loading of > 0.70.

The g-loading – Scale

0.00 – 0.39: Foundational, The test measures a very specific cognitive niche (e.g., simple memory or basic spatial orientation).

0.40 – 0.69 Good/Strong, A reliable indicator of general cognitive ability and abstract reasoning.

0.70 – 1.00: Elite/Superior,The “Gold Standard” in high-range psychometrics. These tests are highly efficient at measuring fluid intelligence (gF), with extreme precision.

3.

Validity – (The Correlation (r) – (Criterion validity))

The r-value indicates the degree of alignment between our instruments and world-renowned professional IQ tests (such as the WAIS-IV or Raven’s Progressive Matrices).

Correlation (r) – Scale

0.00 – 0.29 (Specific/Unique): The test measures a unique aspect of logic that may not be captured by traditional clinical instruments.

0.30 – 0.49 (Moderate Correlation): The test aligns well with established frameworks while maintaining its own unique high-range structure.

0.50 – 0.70+: (Strong to very strong correlation – High Validity): Demonstrates that the assessment is strongly benchmarked against global gold standards, ensuring your score is a valid reflection of your intelligence as measured by the broader scientific community.

Our Research: We continuously correlate our data with established psychometric instruments to maintain high g-loadings across all assessments.

Professional Context & Interpretation

While our assessments are engineered with high psychometric precision and demonstrate strong reliability, it is important to note that these are high-range cognitive instruments designed for independent assessment.

Clinical Comparison: These tests are not intended to replace professional, supervised clinical assessments such as the WAIS-IV or Stanford-Binet, which are administered by licensed psychologists.

Result Accuracy: However, our data indicates that for the majority of participants, the results tend to reflect true cognitive ability and correlate closely with standardized IQ scores. They serve as a highly effective tool for individuals seeking to measure their intellectual potential.